Ironically, Stan Glantz criticized the study specifically because it examined the effect of electronic cigarettes on quitting among smokers who desired to quit. According to an in the New York Times: "Stanton A. Glantz, a professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, said the study’s limitation was that it tried to measure the effect of e-cigarette use only among smokers who were trying hard to quit, not all smokers."

For this reason, I am discouraged about the possibility that people like Dr. Glantz and Dr. Chapman will change their minds about the potential utility of e-cigarettes if further evidence accumulates to demonstrate the benefits of these products. The science is simply not going to matter to them. Hopefully, the science will matter to the FDA.

What the story demonstrates is that Dr. Glantz has a pre-determined set of conclusions about electronic cigarettes and the tobacco companies' role in inappropriately marketing these products to addict a new generation of kids. When presented with information, he jumps to an immediate interpretation and conclusion that supports his pre-determined schema. Instead of exercising critical judgment and objective evaluation of the evidence, he immediately twists the facts to support his pre-existing position. Dr. Glantz is just one example of a phenomenon that characterizes a number of researchers and tobacco control groups that are vehement opponents of electronic cigarettes for ideological, rather than valid scientific reasons.

Sadly, although the Surgeon General's report draws conclusions about the health impact of filtered cigarettes, it only cites one of these seven studies (the Luchtenborg study). And in citing that study, the report merely notes its finding that smoking increases colon cancer risk. It hides this study's finding that this increased colon cancer risk was only detected among smokers of non-filtered cigarettes!

So are the premium E-Juices really worth the high price tag over the cheaper E-Juices This depends on person to person. For me, I’ve tried dozens of E-Juices, and there were cheaper E-Juices I really loved as well as a lot of the premium E-Juices as well. However, a satisfying cheap E-Juice is difficult to find. I’m certainly not saying it doesn’t exist but more often than not, they tend to disappoint; whereas the premium flavors are spot on and taste incredible most of the time. But again I stress taste is subjective; you may find some of the premium flavors absolutely horrible and be out $30. So definitely read some of the reviews before purchasing if you are a cautious buyer.

LAST：innokin mvp2 |NEXT：itaste innokin