The reason I resigned from the ANR Executive Board was that the organization told me that it placed a higher value on its political objectives than on scientific integrity. This story illustrates that ANR continues to operate on this unethical strategy.

Once again, shoddy research by opponents of electronic cigarettes has led to a situation where false conclusions are being disseminated widely to the media and the public. Most unfortunately, damage is being done to the public's health because news headlines like this are likely to dissuade many smokers from trying to quit using e-cigarettes. Of course, this means they will continue smoking the toxic real ones.

The reason for the failure of these researchers to disclose their past relationships with the tobacco industry is not entirely clear, but may revolve around their interpretation of the conflict of interest disclosure form's requirements. In section 3 of the form, authors of articles are asked to disclose any financial relationships with industry that occurred within the past three years. However, neither of the two co-authors has received money from any tobacco companies since 2010.

"We believe that statements from the research community need to be evidence-based. While lively debates help to advance science and policy, adherence to good scientific practice is paramount. We need more rigour and oversight to ensure that interpretation of evidence is guided by data, not emotions, and that strong statements based on weak evidence are avoided. We need those reviewing

The odds ratio for successful quitting for the e-cigarette group compared to subjects who used no cessation aid was 1.38 (95% confidence interval, 1.08-2.93).

LAST：Kamry Robot V E Cigarette Mechanical Mod with 2000mAh 18650 rechargeable battery |NEXT：wholesale kamry k1000