What it means is that the ERS would rather that a smoker who cannot quit using other means continue smoking than switch to electronic cigarettes. The ERS clearly states that it opposes the use of electronic cigarettes, period. Thus, it implies that it opposes the use of electronic cigarettes by a smoker who is unable to quit via any other smoking cessation method. For such an individual, the ERS statement implies that it would actually prefer the smoker to continue smoking than to quit via the use of electronic cigarettes.
Recent data (Monthly tracking of key performance indicators; Electronic cigarettes in England - latest trends) from the Smoking Toolkit Study (Cancer Research UK, UK Centre for Tobacco Control Studies) reveal the following critical points:
Today, I reveal that the CDC's Office on Smoking and Health (OSH) - the lead agency that produces the report - is apparently intentionally hiding the conflicts of interest. In other words, OSH knows about these conflicts but has apparently decided not to share this information with the public. That is, OSH is intentionally hiding these conflicts from the public.
Not everyone is informed as we are about what exactly an electronic cigarette is. Cigarettes have been demonized for decades; the very fact that it’s called an electronic cigarette and produces a opaque vapor during exhale has many misinformed individuals terrified.
LAST:kangertech pro 3 |NEXT:kangertech evod 2