Today, I express my opinion that the use of these studies to draw conclusions about the efficacy of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation is not just unscientific, but dishonest as well.

1. Electronic cigarette companies cannot inform consumers that these products are safer than cigarettes, and they cannot even tell the public that they are free of tobacco.

Snowdon also noted that the UK National Smoking Cessation Conference was funded by GlaxoSmithKline and Pfizer. He wrote:

What possible justification is there for banning advertising for electronic cigarettes, but not for the real thing?

In other words, despite acknowledging that they cannot tell from their study whether e-cigarette use precedes smoking or whether smoking precedes e-cigarette use, they nonetheless draw the conclusion that e-cigarette use precedes smoking.

LAST：protank 3 price |NEXT：kanger protank