Would one therefore conclude that taking an exam is just as risky, in terms of respiratory effects, as smoking a cigarette? Apparently, Dr. Glantz would draw such a conclusion. But it is easy to see why this is an inappropriate conclusion. And we would never disseminate messages to the public that smoking is no more hazardous than taking an exam.

Let’s keep the short and sweet and talk about . What this means is Pennsylvania isstarting the year in the hole, or in the red. They’ve budgeted more money than they actually have and are trying to find ways to make up for it. Among many of their genius (obviously sarcasm) ideas of making up for this budget deficit is to put a sin tax on electronic cigarettes.

The Michigan Medical Society has that would protect the public's health by prohibiting the sale of electronic cigarettes to minors.

At the end of the day, if you need to lie in order to make your point, it seems to me that you need to go back and reassess your position. I think today would be a good day for ANR to go back to the drawing board.

LAST：protank 3 glass |NEXT：evod protank