How, then, do they get away with this?

One thing both opponents and proponents of e-cigarettes agree on is the need for more research. As electronic devices become more prevalent and users have prolonged exposure to vapor cigarettes scientists and health organizations can study the effects and present more clear positions on e-cigarette use. For now, e-cigs are quite obviously a safer method for nicotine delivery than the inhalation of smoke.

The article reports the results of a cross-sectional sample of adolescents interviewed in 2011 and 2012 in the National Youth Tobacco Survey. Youths were asked to report their smoking status as well as their e-cigarette use, both any use and current use (at least once in the past month).

According to an in the Philadelphia Inquirer: "The tax, anticipated to bring in $1.6 million per week, could raise $45 million this year and $83 million in the first full year. The Philadelphia School District has a $93 million budget deficit."

What this indicates is that this is not simply junk science. Rather, it is a deliberate attempt on the part of the investigators to misuse data. They are using these data to draw a conclusion about whether electronic cigarettes are effective in helping smokers quit, yet they are knowingly drawing upon data from smokers who are using e-cigarettes for other reasons, who may have simply tried an electronic cigarette once, and who most definitely were not using these products as part of a current quit attempt.

LAST：pyrex protank 2 |NEXT：kanger protank 2 glass replacement