A defective cigarette is one which causes health effects "beyond those normally associated with tobacco product use."

"The FDA proposalwouldsignificantly delay the implementation of premarket review for newly covered products. Most egregiously, the proposal creates a twenty-four month provisional period for the submission of tobacco product marketing applications. Applicationsreceived during the provisional period enable thecontinued marketing of the productuntil the FDA acts on the application which may be wellbeyond the twenty-fourmonth period. A similar loophole was established during the passage of the Act to apply to cigarettes and smokeless products. The FDA received 3,517 applications but three years later has only issued an order removing four products from the market. After the withdrawal of 117 applications, the tobacco companies are still able to market the unapproved products represented by the 3,396 outstanding applications."

What is most disturbing to me about this story is that there is clearly no room for a difference in opinion in the tobacco control movement about certain dogmatic elements of the field. You can't express disagreement without facing personal attack, no matter how well you support your argument with scientific evidence. Like a religion, you can't challenge the gospel-like nature of movement's mantra without being viewed as a heretic.

The Truth: None of the cigarette companies have claimed that electronic cigarettes are safe. Moreover, the company which Wimmer cites as evidence of his assertion is not a tobacco company at all. NEwhere is purely an electronic cigarette company. It is not owned by Big Tobacco or any other tobacco company.

LAST：kanger protank glassomizer |NEXT：kanger replacement heads