Included in a recent editorial, Dr. Michael Katz mentioned that the FDA should monitor electronic cigarettes as a nicotine delivery tool, and that electronic cigarettes should continue to be banned in locations where typical tobacco products are not allowed. “Unfortunately, the evidence on whether e-cigarettes help smokers to quit is contradictory and inconclusive,” Katz wrote. He did say he was willing to support their use if “there were good data indicating that they helped smokers to stop.” Dr. Gilbert Ross, medical and executive director of The American Council on Science and Health, said “allowing e-cigs to compete with cigarettes in the marketplace might decrease smoking-related morbidity and mortality.”

But other health academics have disagreed and have written to the World Health Organisation describing e-cigarettes as potentially life-saving.

Earlier this week, I that the 2014 Surgeon General's fails to disclose the conflicts of interest of its authors, many of whom have received money from pharmaceutical companies which manufacture the very products about which the report opines. I also how this is particularly problematic, since the report itself complains about how historically, tobacco-funded scientists failed to disclose their conflicts of interest. I concluded that the 2014 Surgeon General's report is violating the very ethical principles that it attacks the tobacco company for violating in the past, and I note that while there has been substantial progress in the past 50 years in the area of disclosure of conflicts of interest, somehow that progress has evaded the producers of the Surgeon General's report itself.

LAST：SMOK RDA wholesale |NEXT：SMOK T-Dux 1.6S wholesale