With this kind of foresight, these researchers could have easily won $250,000 to fund their research without having to bother the taxpayers. They could have simply put a $2,500 bet on the first score in the Super Bowl being a safety and they would have saved the state of California a quarter of a million bucks.

But it doesn't end there.

Ironically, in the long run, hiding the influence of Big Pharma on smoking cessation policy does not advance the cessation field, but brings it to a grinding halt. The public, and tobacco control practitioners themselves, need to understand the deeply ingrained roots of Big Pharma within the tobacco control movement, especially in the smoking cessation field. Failure to do so will lead to blind following of an industry-based agenda. This is precisely what has happened in tobacco control.

I am aware of no consumer product on the market that is prohibited by federal law or regulation from truthfully informing consumers of the primary benefit of that product.

Every day . Smoking tobacco is the biggest cause of preventable death in the world. We all know smoking kills, yet for some strange reason smokers still smoke.There are two types of thought on how to address this problem:

This is a disastrous and irresponsible public position.

And it is not the CEOs of Blu or NJOY who shouldn't be able to sleep at night, it is Senator Rockefeller. How can he sleep each night, knowing that his actions are responsible for thousands of kids who, in the past four years, have become addicted to menthol cigarettes because he failed to act responsibly and are eventually going to die prematurely because of his sellout to Philip Morris?

LAST：new electronic cigarettes |NEXT：protank 3 replacement glass