Why would we want to suppress the provision of this information to the public? And what justification is there for a government-mandated suppression of the truth?

The article does mention that a clinical trial of e-cigarettes found that these products were as effective as the nicotine patch, but it then dismisses this result, concluding instead that: "e-cigarettes are not associated with successful quitting in general population-based samples of smokers."

If the FDA goes ahead with its proposal to subject electronic cigarettes to section 911 of the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, e-cigarettes will become the first such product.

"It is difficult to estimate the extent to which industry-generated research activities have influenced scientific thinking regarding the effects of nicotine on cognitive performance and on nicotine’s therapeutic applications. Authors’ industry affiliations and potential conflicts of interest reported in publications may go unnoticed by readers, may be difficult to identify, or may not be disclosed at all. Reviews and other articles citing industry-affiliated studies generally did not include author affiliations or potential conflicts of interest at all, leaving the readers unaware of possible industry influences."

LAST：e cigarette for sale newest 50watt box mod design by Pioneer4you ipv 50w box mod |NEXT：2014 cheapest accept paypal vivi nova tank cartomizer