In order to draw the conclusion that Dr. Glantz drew in his comment, one would have to completely ignore this study. Obviously, Dr. Glantz has done exactly that. He has based his comment on one narrow study and ignored the rest of the literature.

Why is the CDC unable to tell the truth? Why can't the agency even issue a statement that is internally consistent on this issue? Why is the CDC ignoring the wealth of evidence that it admits exists, which shows that many ex-smokers have used electronic cigarettes effectively as a smoking cessation aid?

LAST：2014 electronic cigarette pen style electronic cigarette ego ce4 gift box |NEXT：Hangsen (HAYES TWIST) ego twist best best wickless atomizer ecig with adjusting voltage battery, various vaping experience