The rest of the story is that this is not an employment policy based on health principles. Instead, it is part of a moral crusade against a particular health behavior (i.e., a vice) which is being punished in a discriminatory fashion.

Here are the three claims, an analysis of what they insinuate to the public, and an explanation of why they are false, misleading, and potentially defamatory:

In my opinion, rather than being an objective scientific review of the literature, this article is little more than a hatchet job on e-cigarettes. The authors clearly have reached a pre-determined conclusion that e-cigarettes are not helpful in smoking cessation and they stretch science beyond recognition in trying to get the published scientific evidence to support this conclusion.

The main results were as follows: "In thesurvey of e-cig users, dependence on e-cigs was significantly lower than it hadbeen on cigarettes (8.6 v 14.9). ... Currente-cig users are significantly less dependent on e-cigs than they were oncigarettes prior to switching."

LAST：Good quality e cig green smoke(Evod) |NEXT：Unique 1.3ml Esmart Clearomizer E smart Starter kit E cigs