If the policy were based on health principles, it would encourage smokers to quit, and therefore, it would reward smokers who are trying to quit using nicotine patches, nicotine gum, or electronic cigarettes, rather than exclude these individuals from employment.

The unfortunate part of the story is that California taxpayers funded this proposal to the tune of a quarter of a million dollars. What a waste of money. They could have saved the money because the researchers had already drawn their conclusions. Why waste the money on actually conducting research when the conclusions of that research have already been drawn, and disseminated!

But e-cigarettes should not be treated the same as cigarettes. Doing so removes the incentive for people to switch from real cigarettes to e-cigarettes and therefore will increase smoking, and with it, death.

Today, I'd like to clearly and unequivocally say, as a staunch anti-smoking advocate:

1. The regulations ban the sale of electronic cigarettes to minors, both in person and via the internet.

On his Twitter feed, Dr. Simon Chapman also attacked Big Tobacco for running this ad, accusing Lorillard of "viraling" this ad "to teens."

LAST：HOLL atomizer 2014 new popular product best e cig rebuildable atomizer |NEXT：best evod cartomizer 2.4ml with CE and RoHS, paypal acceptable