Health officials, of course, continue to deny a link to the ban of electronic cigarettes but rather instead blame on cuts to anti-smoking programs statewide. They also blame it on the rise of young smokers and the current methodology of deterring smoking is outdated. So instead they want to dump more money into anti-smoking programs to counter the new rise of new smokers.

This conclusion - that thirdhand smoke is deadly - was disseminated widely throughout the world. Headlines read like this:

As tobacco control advocates commemorate the 50th anniversary of the release of the 1964 Surgeon General's report on smoking by Dr. Luther Terry, we are praising Dr. Terry for his groundbreaking and pivotal work that many view as having started the tobacco control movement. Dr. Terry served as Surgeon General of the United States Public Health Service from 1961 to 1965.

The report concludes by calling on the Food and Drug Administration to remove candy-flavored NRT products from the market and to regulate the marketing of NRT so that it does not appeal to or target youths.

"According tothe, e-cigarette use in England has been rising since2011, when the survey began. Meanwhile, the percentage of smokerswho reported quitting in the previous year rose from 4.6 percent in2011 to 6.2 percent in 2012. The cessation rate was 6.1 percentlast year and 8.7 percent in the first quarter of this year. Duringthe same period the success rate of smokers who tried to quit rosefrom 13.7 percent to 21.4 percent. Those numbers suggest the real promise of e-cigarettes—not as anefarious plot to hook teenagers on nicotine but as a harm-reducingalternative to smoking. If the FDA follows Durbin's advice, it willban most e-cigarette flavors, making the switch less appealing tosmokers who prefer the prohibited varieties, and restricte-cigarette advertising, making smokers less aware of a competingproduct that could literally save their lives."

The rest of the story is this study actually found no effect of electronic cigarette use on pulmonary function tests, indicating that there was no clinically significant observable effect of vaping on lung function. Specifically, the study found "no differences between basic pulmonary measurements" between the two groups, demonstrating that acute exposure to electronic cigarette vapor did not affect FEV1, FVC, PEF or MEF50 and MEF75."

This is dishonesty in research.

LAST：Various Colors Clearomizer Starter Kit Ego CE5 atomizer wholesale exgo w3 |NEXT：beautiful new style e cigarette e smart at factory price