Yet again, the FDA has made it eminently clear that it is not sure that cigarette smoking is any more hazardous than vaping.

It is clear, then, that this study violated the principles of informed consent, as subjects did not provide informed consent prior to being enrolled in the research.

Earlier this week, I discussed an published in the journal Tobacco Control and a blog on the article, in which a set of anti-smoking researchers attacked the cigarette industry for complying with the law. The article and commentary criticize tobacco companies for changing their labeling of "light" and "ultra-light" cigarette brands by removing these terms and instead, giving the brands different colors to differentiate them. The study found that manufacturers removed the "lights" labels, as required by law, and substituted colors for the banned descriptors. The study concludes that the tobacco companies circumvented the law and argues that these brands should be labeled by the FDA as "adulterated" and pulled from the market.

The Rest of the Story

B. Announced a gradual reduction in nicotine levels in cigarettes to non-addictive levels.

LAST：Gi2 Box Mod 100w Vv/vw Dna Killer GI2 100W Huge Vaporizer Custom Mod IPV2 DNA ZNA killer IN STOCK!!! |NEXT：Beautiful 320mAh high quality rechargeable vapor e smart e cig exgo