Ironically, Dr. Glantz (and numerous anti-smoking groups) are supporting the protective legislation. Which raises the question: Who is acting more as a Big Tobacco front group? The e-cigarette associations, which are fighting protective legislation for tobacco cigarettes, or Glantz and the anti-smoking groups, which are trying to get protective legislation ensconced in every state throughout the country, so that cigarette profits are protected nationwide?

As I revealed earlier this week, Stan Glantz has publicly which imply that electronic cigarette companies have been behind the scenes and paying for statements by a number of right-wing think tanks that are supportive of electronic cigarettes.

From the researchers themselves!

"Would I like (e-cigarettes) to be regulated by a organization like FDA that can make those subtle distinctions among tobacco products? Yes. Do I want them to be regulated exactly like other tobacco products? No, because not all tobacco products are the same, and too many people think they are and act like they are."

LAST：2013 best cartomizer of ego electronic cigarette GS-H2 Ego/510 thread |NEXT：PCC series f quick disconnect 2013 Good Convenient protable Ego series ecigarette solar new electronic cigarette pcc