The second of these two North Carolina debates is whether or not to impose their current 4.75% general state sales tax on the electronic cigarettes themselves, but doesn’t collect the federal or state excise tax on the nicotine containing e-liquid as it does on other nicotine related products. At the center of this issue is the fact that E-cigarettes do not contain or burn any tobacco. Rather, e-cigarettes use batteries to heat and vaporize a nicotine containing liquid or E-liquid. It is because of this, the U.S. Food & Drug Administration or FDA has labeled these devices as “tobacco products” which are subject to the federal excise tax. If this legislation is implemented in the 2014 summer short session, the expected revenue that it is projected to bring in by fiscal year 2016 is around $5 million a year.

Yesterday, I reported that Drs. Stan Glantz and Simon Chapman issued against Lorillard for running an inappropriate blu e-cigarette commercial (the robot sex ad). The truth is that Lorillard had nothing to do with the ad, which was produced in 2010, well before Lorillard acquired blu.

The report goes on to state:

Thus, as revealed and described in this lawsuit brief and in an accompanying : "Drs. Neil Benowitz, Jack E. Henningfield and Jonathan M. Samet are conflicted ... due to their continuing financial relationships with pharmaceutical companies that make smoking-cessation products."

The Rest of the Story

LAST：Nice design Newest 510 thread dripping atomizer igo w3 with fast delivery |NEXT：new e cig product liquid for electronic cigarette