One would expect a similar experience with youth e-cigarette experimenters. Once they get used to the sweet flavors of electronic cigarettes, it is hard to fathom that they could then be drawn to the harsh taste of tobacco. It is difficult to imagine a youth switching from a gummy bear flavored e-cigarette to a Marlboro.

Report STS140122 (Electronic cigarettes in England - latest trends) draws the following conclusions:

So why would Governor Chafee want to place a heavy tax on electronic cigarettes, and thus shift sales away from the fake cigarettes and toward the real ones?

I understand the venom that these policy makers have for electronic cigarettes because they look like cigarettes; however, their desire to protect tobacco cigarettes from competition from these safer products is not enough to justify urging their state Attorneys General to trample on the Constitution and to violate well-established state contract law.

Ironically, Dr. Glantz (and numerous anti-smoking groups) are supporting the protective legislation. Which raises the question: Who is acting more as a Big Tobacco front group? The e-cigarette associations, which are fighting protective legislation for tobacco cigarettes, or Glantz and the anti-smoking groups, which are trying to get protective legislation ensconced in every state throughout the country, so that cigarette profits are protected nationwide?

LAST：Top selling electronic ciarette ego battery, ego ce4, ego ce5 starter kit, |NEXT：Wholesale Newest Illuminatus Mod Illuminatus Mechanical Mod vs ecig atomizer exgo