The authors of this study make one of the most cardinal errors in all of epidemiology. They ignore the principle that "correlation does not equal causation."

In their to this response, the authors of the study clarify their reasoning for attacking the cigarette companies, even though they merely complied with the law:

It is perfectly reasonable for the government to intervene to prevent companies from making false or misleading claims to the public. Even severe infringement of free speech by corporations may be justified in the case of preventing the deception of consumers. However, there is little justification for prohibiting companies from telling consumers the truth, and there is no justification for suppressing the truth when those facts are the most pertinent information that the consumer needs to know in order to make an informed decision about using the product.

There is no claim of 100% safe e-cig, but the harmful effects of smoking is well documented. I am not a doctor and I am not qualified to give medical advice. I only share my own opinion and experiences within this site.I do not condone electronic cigarettes for non-smokers, underage people, or pregnant women.

In one of the first studies to examine the trajectory of electronic cigarette use over time, Lechner and colleagues have shown that extended duration of electronic cigarette use is associated with

LAST：Aspire e-cig ce5-s bdc atomizer wholesale top quality e-cig in shenzhen |NEXT：PU Leather ego case Lanyard Carrying Pouch Pocket Neck Sling Rope Round Corner Case Cover for Ego Electronic Cigarette