I am not aware of any other federal law or regulation that prohibits companies from telling consumers the truth about their products as it relates to the primary benefit of the product. Hopefully, the FDA will see the error in its proposal and will reconsider its decision to subject electronic cigarettes to the provisions of section 911.

As I remarked last week, I do not begrudge the CDC for holding a different position than I do on the e-cigarette issue. However, the agency crosses the line when it lies to the public in order to support its position. Dishonesty has no place on the agenda of a federal public health agency, especially one that is as highly reputed as the CDC.

Frankly, these politicians are full of baloney. If they were truly concerned about the use of flavors to addict youth to nicotine and tobacco products, they would not have supported legislation with an exemption for menthol. And more importantly, if they really cared about the health of the nation's youth, they would be calling for an immediate ban on the use of menthol in tobacco cigarettes -- the real ones.

Before making an accusation like this, it is imperative that Dr. Glantz have evidence that electronic companies have mobilized these think-tanks to push their policy agenda. But the evidence that Glantz cites to support his accusation merely demonstrate that these groups have taken positions which support electronic cigarettes as a potential harm reduction strategy for tobacco control. None of the documents that Glantz cites indicate that any electronic cigarette company had anything to do with orchestrating, mobilizing, or affecting the positions taken by these groups.

LAST：CE 100% ture original kanger e cig smart pcc |NEXT：new LCD IGO4 electronic cigarette dual 240 atomizer