"Frieden acknowledged that “stick to stick, they’re almost certainly less toxic than cigarettes" and that many people have quit smoking tobacco cigarettes with the help of e-cigarettes. However, he said, “the plural of anecdote is not data.”"

The rest of the story is that despite the Common Rule and the intense efforts to try to prevent human subject violations in research, there are still occasional studies which find their way through the cracks. This is one bad example. It is an example of an unethical experiment that should never have been approved by an IRB in its current form because it blatantly violates the ethical principles of both consent and informed consent.

Adding to the long list of tobacco control practitioners who have publicly declared that smoking may be no more harmful than vaping - which involves no tobacco and no combustion - a South Carolina respiratory therapist is telling patients that they should not quit smoking using electronic cigarettes because these devices may be more dangerous than tobacco cigarettes, which kills more than 400,000 Americans each year.

Thus, as revealed and described in this lawsuit brief and in an accompanying : "Drs. Neil Benowitz, Jack E. Henningfield and Jonathan M. Samet are conflicted ... due to their continuing financial relationships with pharmaceutical companies that make smoking-cessation products."

LAST：Newest SMOK innovation in 2014 hot sale vv/vw mechanical mod cartomizer e-pipe |NEXT：DSE 901 Cartridge 5/Pack- Empty