Ironically, Stan Glantz criticized the study specifically because it examined the effect of electronic cigarettes on quitting among smokers who desired to quit. According to an in the New York Times: "Stanton A. Glantz, a professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, said the study’s limitation was that it tried to measure the effect of e-cigarette use only among smokers who were trying hard to quit, not all smokers."

I don't understand why electronic cigarette researchers who oppose electronic cigarettes have to go to such extremes to deceive, mislead, and lie to the public. Why are we acting like the tobacco industry used to? Where is the error in simply being honest and truthful to American consumers?

My personal hope is to see everyone use electronic cigarettes and what got me started was seeing a pack a day smokers make the switch with little effort. I believe by switching the older more stubborn generation of smokers, we’ll see a decline of smokers overall. The newer generation is more prone to change and adaptation of new technology.

(See: Dutra LM, Glantz SA. Electronic cigarettes and conventional cigarette use: a cross-sectional study. Published online March 6, 2014. JAMA Pediatr. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.5488.)

LAST：Hot Selling Dual Coil for Iclear 16 Clearomizer CE5 Atomizer Iclear 16 |NEXT：variable wattage iTaste SVD PK e cigarette igo