The unfortunate part of the story is that California taxpayers funded this proposal to the tune of a quarter of a million dollars. What a waste of money. They could have saved the money because the researchers had already drawn their conclusions. Why waste the money on actually conducting research when the conclusions of that research have already been drawn, and disseminated!

So the key argument against electronic cigarettes is that for every person who they help by getting them off of cigarettes, there is another person who they prevent from getting off cigarettes.

If we accept that authors' word - that there is no way from this study to exclude the possibility that youths are initiating smoking with conventional cigarettes and then moving on to e-cigarettes - then it follows that these authors are being dishonest in telling the public that the study shows that:

Regardless, the AHA considers e-cigarettes that do “contain nicotine to be tobacco products and therefore supports their regulation under existing laws relating to the use and marketing of tobacco products.” They suggest regulation in the areas of youth marketing, smoke-free air laws, and manufacturing, in order to make sure e-cigarettes don’t encourage nicotine use, which no matter what the delivery method, does present health dangers to its users.

LAST：rebuildable atomizer 2014 Bovoo Professional Manufacturer e cig rebuildable atomizer ego ce5+ atomizer |NEXT：ego ce4 ce5 atomizer exgo e smart e cigarette ecigator eshisha