In a Tobacco Control by the Center for Tobacco Products at the FDA, the agency states: "While e-cigarette aerosol may contain fewer toxicants than cigarette smoke, studies evaluating whether e-cigarettes are less harmful than cigarettes are inconclusive."

One might argue that this is just one errant professor. However, as it acknowledges on its :

With this kind of foresight, these researchers could have easily won $250,000 to fund their research without having to bother the taxpayers. They could have simply put a $2,500 bet on the first score in the Super Bowl being a safety and they would have saved the state of California a quarter of a million bucks.

If this is the kind of "scientific" reasoning that is going to guide the nation's decisions on how to handle tobacco products which are killing hundreds of thousands of Americans each year, then we may actually be better off reverting back to the "wild, wild west" that Stan Glantz keeps talking about. At least in that wild west, consumers are able to make reasonable judgments about the relative safety of different products. In the FDA-regulated "east," consumers are going to be kept hidden from even the most basic truths: that electronic cigarettes do not contain tobacco and that they are much safer than the real thing.

Furthermore, the Lung Association's position is not at all science-based. There is no evidence that electronic cigarettes are contributing to "more disease, death, and misery." In fact, the current evidence suggests that electronic cigarettes are contributing significantly to the reduction of disease, death, and misery.

LAST：Wholesale CE & ROHS Certification e cigarette 3.5ml bcc atomizer 3.5ml e cigarette bcc atomizer wholesale alibaba china supplier |NEXT：advanced technology Cloupor Cloutank C1 health electronic cigarette pcc