I am aware of no consumer product on the market that is prohibited by federal law or regulation from truthfully informing consumers of the primary benefit of that product.

Would one therefore conclude that taking an exam is just as risky, in terms of respiratory effects, as smoking a cigarette? Apparently, Dr. Glantz would draw such a conclusion. But it is easy to see why this is an inappropriate conclusion. And we would never disseminate messages to the public that smoking is no more hazardous than taking an exam.

LAST：High quality newest You-can OEM panzer mod fit ecig exgo |NEXT：Promotion rebuild 2ml capacity factory price ce6 cartomizer