Why is the CDC unable to tell the truth? Why can't the agency even issue a statement that is internally consistent on this issue? Why is the CDC ignoring the wealth of evidence that it admits exists, which shows that many ex-smokers have used electronic cigarettes effectively as a smoking cessation aid?

The Business Standard reporter was not the only one to get this message from the study and its authors. According to an at Medical Xpress: "Do not smoke and do not allow yourself to be exposed to smoke because second-hand smoke and third-hand smoke are just as deadly as first-hand smoke, says a scientist at the University of California, Riverside who, along with colleagues, conducted the first animal study of the effects of third-hand smoke."

The specific financial interests of the co-authors, according to the anti-smoking groups are:

In my blog , I argued that the cigarette companies cannot possibly be found in violation of the law for using alternative names for their products when the law specifically allowed those products to remain on the market.

LAST：Alibaba China Supplier Wholesale Atomizer Firefog 2 With Gift Box 2014 Rebuildable Ecig Atomizer exgo |NEXT：2014 new BOGE American Shield 30W vapor mechanical mod