The rest of the story is that the 2014 Surgeon General's report is violating the very ethical principles that it attacks the tobacco company for violating in the past. While there has been substantial progress in the past 50 years in the area of disclosure of conflicts of interest, somehow that progress has evaded the producers of the Surgeon General's report itself.

"“There’s so much we don’t yet know about e-cigarettes,” said Douglas Tipperman, M.S.W., a public health advisor at SAMHSA. “They are not harmless. We don’t know the health impact at the individual or the population level.”

Sin taxes are normally applied to a product or service that society feels that it sets back the population as a whole. Some examples of sin taxes include gambling, alcohol, tobacco cigarettes, soft drinks, fast food, and etc. The logic behind sin taxes is these product and services are causing more harm to the general public than good and one of the arguments are the tax is to levy/off set health and medical costs generated by these sin products. Do they actually Not really. Generally speaking sin taxes are applied to a product that is much greater than your average sales tax. Sin taxes differ by state by some states do have a much higher than others. For example a pack of cigarettes in South Carolina is less than $5 a pack, in Arizona however you’re looking at more than $10 per pack.

It may sound like a strong, courageous action from a Board of Health that is being guided by the solid, consistent principle that all nonsmokers should be protected from exposure to secondhand smoke, period.

LAST：wholesale vaporizer pen vaporizer airflow adjustable vaporizer pen &ce5 atomizer ego ce5 |NEXT：fashion designer starter kit mini clear atomizer X-TC rechargeable e cig smart pcc oem available