But there is another important factor that Glantz is forgetting. In the existing studies, the smokers examined had simply cut down on the amount they smoked without substituting another source of nicotine. Therefore, they were highly likely to be compensating by inhaling much more heavily on the cigarettes that they smoked. In contrast, when dual users of e-cigarettes and cigarettes cut down substantially on their smoking, they are doing so by substituting non-tobacco, nicotine cigarettes. One would expect much less, if any, compensation. Thus, the studies that Glantz cites are not quite as relevant as they would otherwise be.

For years, the anti-smoking groups and public health agencies have taken tobacco industry conflicts of interest seriously. Now it is time to have some integrity and fairness and to consider all corporate conflicts of interest, whether they involve Big Tobacco or Big Pharma.

Every day . Smoking tobacco is the biggest cause of preventable death in the world. We all know smoking kills, yet for some strange reason smokers still smoke.There are two types of thought on how to address this problem:

The most baffling part is raising the taxes on electronic cigarettes will only return 25 million dollars. A large number to us regular folks, but it is only 2.5% of the budget deficit. So basically it won’t even make a dent. Also raising the cigarette tax an additional 50 cents would yield 50 million dollars. So by that logic, an additional 25 cents for the regular cigarettes would cover the entire return of electronic cigarettes!

LAST：e-cigarette gs h2 clearomizer gs h2 atomizer cartomizer |NEXT：wholsale 320 mah kanger e cig smart pcc