Fortunately, the vast majority of the public appears to have better scientific judgment than the FDA and to recognize that cigarette smoking is far more hazardous than the use of an electronic nicotine delivery system that merely aerosolizes nicotine from a propylene glycol solution that is completely free of any tobacco or any combustion.

The communications director for another national anti-smoking group added: "This just goes to show that the tobacco companies have not changed. They will go to any extent to keep America's children smoking, even paying university scientists to do their dirty work for them."

Dr. Samet: "During the last decade, Dr. Samet has received grant support for research and writing from GSK on at least six occasions, including in 2010. In addition, he formerly led the Institute for Global Tobacco Control, which is funded by GSK and Pfizer. Moreover, until 2009, Dr. Samet received regular honoraria from Pfizer for his service on the Pfizer Global Tobacco Advisory Board."

In the same article, the lead study author is quoted as stating that: "with prolonged exposure, they [children] may be at significant risk for developing more severe neurological disorders."

Surprisingly, however, the next paragraph of the grant application abstract informs grant reviewers that the researchers actually know the results of this experiment before conducting it. The researchers tell the reviewers that:

But we know this is not the case because in journal articles published by many of the report authors, they have acknowledged multiple conflicts of interest with Big Pharma.

LAST：Dry herb vaporizer cloutank m3 vs dry herb vaporizer exgo w3, Cloutank competitive Price and New design |NEXT：Authentic Smoktech BEC Pro Mod app approved bluetooth ecig