Sure, but only if the revenue is used to directly benefit those who are bearing its burden. Raise the cigarette tax and use the money to fund anti-smoking programs and services, research, and treatment for smokers, especially in poorer communities and communities of color, and the policy is no longer regressive but progressive. It could reduce, rather than exacerbate existing income and health inequities.

The main results were as follows: "In thesurvey of e-cig users, dependence on e-cigs was significantly lower than it hadbeen on cigarettes (8.6 v 14.9). ... Currente-cig users are significantly less dependent on e-cigs than they were oncigarettes prior to switching."

"By January 2014 there were 466 brands (each with its own website) and 7,764 unique flavors. ... Newer brands offered more flavors per brand (49 vs. 32) ... ."

LAST：Erlkonigin Clone RDA Newest Atomizer Clone with Lower Price |NEXT：Electronic Cigarette pcc for 510t bcc