Like Clive, I do not criticize Stan for having a different opinion on the issue of electronic cigarettes. Having a diversity of opinions is a healthy thing and in the long run, it will help ensure that the best possible public policies result. However, misrepresenting scientific evidence, deceiving the public about the science and what it shows, and lying to the media and the public about the science are simply not acceptable. They serve no positive purpose and in the long run, they end up undermining the credibility of the entire tobacco control movement.

Here is what each of the three companies/associations had to say regarding this issue in their submitted comments:

There is no excuse for collecting this important information, but not revealing it to the public. The only legitimate justification for this would be if there were no reported conflicts of interest. In such a case, the report could have included a statement indicating that none of the report's authors reported a conflict of interest.

While most of the national tobacco control organizations are boasting about the amazing progress since the 1964 Surgeon General's report on smoking - progress that they claim has continued to this day - one veteran anti-smoking activist is challenging this dogma, arguing that in recent years, the tobacco control movement has squandered the opporunity to reduce smoking-related disease and death. Instead of continued progress, he says, the tobacco control movement has largely been co-opted by a bureaucracy of national organizations that seem more concerned about bolstering their funding streams than fighting the tobacco industry.

LAST：Wholesale variable voltage Ego Battery Twist 1100 mah |NEXT：2014 crazy selling !!! kanger upgraded dual coil evod 2 kit factory low price