This is not a public health policy. It is a moral crusade.

Perhaps it should be no surprise that these researchers have drawn such a wild and scientifically implausible conclusion like this, one which does not follow at all from their actual research. Why? Because, as I yesterday, these researchers had reached the conclusion of their study years ago, before even conducting the research! In fact, they drew their conclusions when they submitted their grant application. So it comes as no surprise to now see that they are drawing pre-determined conclusions that have nothing to do with their actual research.

The answer, sadly, is D - ban vape shops which sell cigarettes to zero youth in Daly City. Moreover, youths are not even allowed in these vape shops and it would be quite easy to adopt rules to ensure that youths do not have access to these stores.

• I also lied to you when I told you that my own study demonstrated that electronic cigarettes are "a new route to smoking addiction for adolescents." The study was a cross-sectional one, so I could not draw that conclusion. And I admitted it in the article itself. But that's not what I told you.

V2: nicotine, PG, flavorings

With that said, I can’t completely blame Senator Blumenthalbecause the CDC has been disseminating the false assertion that its recentsurvey demonstrated that e-cigarettes are a gateway to smoking addiction. So itappears that the lie originated with the CDC and then was adopted by SenatorBlumenthal. He may not be deserving of all of the blame here. The CDC must bearthe responsibility for originating this lie.

LAST：Kamry K100 - Bronze |NEXT：2014 most popular high quality e cigarette atomizer CE4 ,CE5 ,CE6 , e-cigarette