Yesterday, I that Dr. Stan Glantz has accused electronic cigarette associations of being front groups for Big Tobacco, insinuating that they are masquerading as grassroots vapers' groups but in reality are working to protect Big Tobacco profits.

Polito writes: "Physicians and government health workers are asked to ignorethe fact that, as found by a , more patients quit smoking cold turkey than byall other methods combined, that only a tiny fraction of successfulcessation involves use of any approved product (just 8 percent). Reflect on the fact that after 30 years and billions spent marketing Nicorette, that the Gallup Poll found that only 1 in 100 succeeded via nicotine gum. ... Fifty years of progress? Survey after survey teaches that feeding nicotine to nicotine addicts has nailed cessation to the floor, and that force-feeding weaning programs are costing lives (see , , , , , ). Don't expect to find any abrupt nicotine cessation paper cited in theGeneral's 978 page report. None. Why? Because the invited a number of financially conflicted researchers to help write it. Although impossible to know the role each played, to these eyes, their master's bidding leaps from the report."

Assuming that this is an accurate quote from Dr. Frieden, the CDC is lying. It is not true that the FDA lost a lawsuit to the tobacco industry when it tried to regulate e-cigarettes earlier. The lawsuit it lost was filed by two electronic cigarette companies, neither of which were owned by Big Tobacco. In fact, at the time of that lawsuit, the tobacco companies were not even in the business of selling e-cigarettes. All e-cigarette companies at that time were independent of Big Tobacco.

The Rest of the Story

LAST：alibaba brand manufacturer smok wax e cig atomizer |NEXT：Mini Ego pen like electronic cigarette with 220 mah lithium battery e-cig ego shisha pen