Under this provision, an electronic cigarette company cannot even inform consumers that the product does not produce smoke because such a claim would be considered a "reduced exposure" claim under the Tobacco Act.

At the Rest of the Story, I don't have that luxury. I make the call based on what I see as the most credible scientific evidence available. And at the current time, I believe that for many smokers, electronic cigarettes are a reasonable option for smoking cessation or dramatic smoking reduction. These benefits of electronic cigarettes are demonstrable and there is no evidence that they are being undermined by these products serving as a gateway to tobacco cigarette addiction. In fact, all the evidence at the current time points to a strong relationship between e-cigarette use and decreased overall use of tobacco products, not the other way around.

Can you imagine if the tobacco companies used the same logic as Dr. Glantz? They would, according to his scientific reasoning, be perfectly honest in communicating to the public statements like this:

""

LAST：IJOY manufacturer electronic cigarette , evod e-cigarette cartomizer |NEXT：most popular ego vapor pen vaporizer ego t ce4 hot sale