Even in light of a lack of official health studies, the AHA, as well as many other health care professionals can’t deny the use of e-cigarettes as a harm reducer. The policy from the AHA states: “E-cigarettes either do not contain or have lower levels of several tobacco-derived harmful and potentially harmful constituents compared with cigarettes and smokeless tobacco. In comparison with NRTs, [Nicotine replacement treatments] e-cigarette use has increased at an unprecedented rate, which presents an opportunity for harm reduction if smokers use them as substitutes for cigarettes.”

Yes, this is satire. But it makes the point that the very same arguments that the lawmakers are using to implicate electronic cigarettes in targeting youth could be made to implicate nicotine replacement products such as nicotine gum and lozenges.

Electronic cigarettes, on the other hand, have a clean and cool hit that is soft on the lungs and is designed to satisfy your nicotine cravings, not your cravings for smoke.

2. In contrast to what we reported above, the anti-smoking groups have not - I repeat, have not - criticized the researchers for failing to disclose their conflicts of interest. They did not argue that "section 5 of the form refers to any and all conflicts of interest, regardless of when they occurred," and that "these researchers are breaking not only the spirit, but also the letter of these policies." We apologize for having incorrectly insinuated that these anti-smoking groups are concerned about the scientific and ethical integrity of published tobacco control research.

LAST：Wholesale rechargeable rebuildable atomizer e cigar |NEXT：On Sale 1600mah variable voltage 3.3v-4.8v vision spinner 2 battery vision ecig wholesale