In other words, 92% of the e-cigarette users in the study were not trying to quit. We know for a fact that 92% of the e-cigarette users were not making a quit attempt. And yet the study authors interpret the data as if these smokers were trying to quit using e-cigarettes, but failed!

The problem is that in this cross-sectional study, there is no way to determine the direction of the observed relationship.

I understand the venom that these policy makers have for electronic cigarettes because they look like cigarettes; however, their desire to protect tobacco cigarettes from competition from these safer products is not enough to justify urging their state Attorneys General to trample on the Constitution and to violate well-established state contract law.

The wealthiest 1% of Americans, along with corporations that are enjoying inappropriate tax breaks.

You can see the quality of the scientific reasoning we are dealing with.

If any of my readers can find out, please let me know because it is baffling to understand why a long-time anti-smoking advocate like Stan would want to protect cigarettes from the most serious competition they have ever faced. If this flavoring ban is enacted, Stan will have the rare role of being not only the hero of the tobacco control movement but the hero of the cigarette promotion movement as well.

LAST：high quality huge vapor ego t with ce4 ego t |NEXT：newest e cigarette mod 2013 sigaretta elettronica igo 3