In law, there is a term used to refer to what Glantz and Chapman are doing here. It is called defamation.

The rest of the story is that not only is CDC failing to disclose the important conflicts of interest of the 2014 Surgeon General's report authors, but OSH is involved in a cover-up. Apparently, OSH has deliberately chosen to hide these conflicts of interest from the public.

Recently, Stan Glantz and colleagues called for a on electronic cigarette flavorings. Other anti-smoking groups have also urged the FDA to implement a ban on the use of flavors in electronic cigarettes. I have already why such an intervention makes no sense because it essentially represents a ban on electronic cigarettes, prevents brand differentiation, and greatly decreases the appeal of these products, thus forever protecting the market share of tobacco cigarettes. Today, I explain why the flavors in electronic cigarettes probably play a role in deterring youth smoking. Thus, I provide another argument for why the FDA should not ban electronic cigarette flavors.

LAST：2014 unusual design1600 mah vision spinner 2 |NEXT：2014 TOP Sale Marvellous Portable Patent Design for Wax Seego Ehit Vhit Glacier vaporizer ce5 with model patent for wax