The rest of the story is that new data from the CDC itself show that the smoking rate among U.S. high school students dropped significantly in 2013, reaching the (the Youth Risk Behavior Survey), which began in 1991.

"The government has an obligation to carefully scrutinize any new consumer product that is presented as an alternative to smoking. But government agencies and public health officials have no business discouraging or disparaging e-cigarettes in the absence of any data that they are causing harm. This is especially the case when these products have so much potential to curb cigarette smoking, the public health scourge that still claims half a million lives a year."

That the FDA is not sure whether smoking is any more hazardous than vaping does not say a lot for the agency's scientific standards.

If Stan does apologize and/or retract his false accusations, please send me a cable because I want to know about it right away. But I'm not holding my breath. The truth is just too much for idealogues like Glantz to take. It is only through lies that they can discredit the overwhelming experience of tens of thousands of vapers that these products are helping them to improve their health and potentially save their lives.

And even if vaping involved deeper inhalation than smoking, how would that demonstrate that vaping is more dangerous than smoking, especially since the vaper is inhaling far fewer carcinogenic chemicals - and at far lower levels - than the smoker?

LAST：New!!! Latest ego products wax vaporizer pen glass globe vaporizer wax-t pyrex clearomizer |NEXT：Our company can provide e liquid bottle e liquid display e cigarette liquid