Similarly, the study found that 2.9% of the baseline nonsmokers had ever tried an electronic cigarette in the past year. It could have been that the respondent took a single puff on an electronic cigarette and never took another puff.

There is a provision for of informed consent; however, the conditions for such a waiver were not met because: (1) the level of risk was not minimal; (2) the waiver did affect the rights and welfare of the subjects; (3) the research could still practicably have been carried out with informed consent; (4) subjects were not provided with information after the study to explain what occurred.

The rest of the story is that this is what the tobacco industry used to do. It is not how we in tobacco control should be conducting our business.

Now you may be thinking this isn’t your problem its the problem of the misinformed! The soccer moms and the PTA parents! Regardless of what our opinions may be rules are rules and this is especially important during a time of mass misinformation in the media. Not to mention our elected officials wanting to tax high percentages (seriously more than 70%) on all vaping products. We don’t want our average Jane/Joe to hold a personal vendetta when you blow clouds in their and especially their children’s faces!

If this study leads some smokers to smoke inside because they believe the researchers, who say that thirdhand smoke is no less harmful than secondhand smoke, then this could lead to serious public health harm to children.

LAST：CE, ROHS transparent free glue Watchye 3-in-1 galss tank clear cartomizer electronic cigarette |NEXT：Vogue 900mAh PCC 280mAh battery capacity mini electronic cigarette starter kit e cigarette slim