While I agree with the editorial, it is quite a condemnation of the current field of tobacco control research.

The harshest questioning came from Senators Richard Blumenthal, Barbara Boxer, and Jay Rockefeller:

When I looked at the bottle, I saw that the E-Juice wasn’t clear or see through like the E-Juices I bought from retailers. In fact, it was cloudy and very similar to a bottle of oil and vinegar. Long story short, it wasn’t completely homogeneous yet that is the flavoring hasn’t bonded with the base completely. I shook it for what felt like a good 30 minutes and it was still very cloudy.

Today, I express my opinion that the use of these studies to draw conclusions about the efficacy of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation is not just unscientific, but dishonest as well.

However, from a public health perspective, the relevant question is not what results one would obtain if smokers were forced to use a particular strategy, but what results are obtained when smokers make the choice to use a particular strategy. This is why Stan Glantz's approach is inappropriate.

While the new law may provide for "consistent, uniform healthful environments from town to town," it doesn't do so if that town is named "Atlantic City."

LAST：New arrival Transparent Evod clearomizer with bottom coil, only $1.4 |NEXT：top selling watchcig high quality e cig green smoke