Senator David Leyonhjelm is acting like an errand boy in Parliament for "big tobacco", writes Simon Chapman in The Drum.

Electronic cigarettes, on the other hand, have a clean and cool hit that is soft on the lungs and is designed to satisfy your nicotine cravings, not your cravings for smoke.

The positions taken by these groups are actually very reasonable. In fact, I completely agree with their positions as stated in the op-eds and articles that Glantz cites. As it turns out, I am quoted in a number of these articles. So does this mean that I, too, am being orchestrated by electronic cigarette companies to push their policy agenda?

Recently, Stan Glantz and colleagues called for a on electronic cigarette flavorings. Other anti-smoking groups have also urged the FDA to implement a ban on the use of flavors in electronic cigarettes. I have already why such an intervention makes no sense because it essentially represents a ban on electronic cigarettes, prevents brand differentiation, and greatly decreases the appeal of these products, thus forever protecting the market share of tobacco cigarettes. Today, I explain why the flavors in electronic cigarettes probably play a role in deterring youth smoking. Thus, I provide another argument for why the FDA should not ban electronic cigarette flavors.

"While we have heard from former smokers who say e-cigarettes helped them quit, we have to ignore their statements because we just can't bring ourselves to admit that something which looks like a cigarette could possibly be a good thing and could have positive benefits like helping a smoker get off of tobacco cigarettes."

LAST：refillable ego electronic cigarette input cigarette liquid ego-ce4 |NEXT：alibaba wholesale easy to refill and clean Clearomizer CE5+ atomizer wholesale exgo w3