Harris et al., in perhaps the most comprehensive and definitive on this issue, found a clear increase in cancer risk associated with non-filtered cigarettes. As they reported: "Compared with smokers of medium tar (15-21 mg) filter cigarettes, risk was higher among men and women who smoked high tar (> or = 22 mg) non-filter brands (hazard ratio 1.44, 95% confidence interval 1.20 to 1.73, and 1.64, 1.26 to 2.15, respectively)."

If you read the comments to yesterday's post, in which I opine that it is time for Major League Baseball to ban the use of smokeless tobacco by its players during games, you'll see that I was battered by a number of harm reduction advocates. This battering also took place on Twitter and Facebook, where further pot shots were taken.

The study concludes that the tobacco companies circumvented the law and argues that these brands should be labeled by the FDA as "adulterated" and pulled from the market.

But here is why that knee-jerk reflex that CTFK exhibits any time a tax increase is discussed is short-sighted and premature.

LAST：Fantasia ehookah e-cigarette ego well B1 variable voltage battery with vv mod most powerful vaporizer ECIG |NEXT：Sigelei Technology Co., ltd variable volt mod mini zmax 18350,18500 battery igo e-cigarette electronic cigarette atomizer