In my blog , I argued that the cigarette companies cannot possibly be found in violation of the law for using alternative names for their products when the law specifically allowed those products to remain on the market.

• We lied to you when we told you that "No studies have been done to examine the safety of e-cigarettes."

My argument was echoed in a to the article by Steven Pinkerton, a public health researcher from the Medical College of Wisconsin, who pointed out that: "the major tobacco companies demonstrated 100% compliance with the law by eliminating all terms specified in the FSPTCA [Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act]--the use of colour terms to designate sub-brands is not regulated by the FSPTCA."

Today, I reflect on what this story demonstrates about the scientific bias that is apparent in the anti-smoking movement, particularly among researchers like Dr. Glantz, who has repeatedly misinterpreted scientific studies in order to skewer electronic cigarettes.

These politicians should stop lying to the American public in order to support their pre-determined agenda. Science, not politics, should guide public health policy in this nation.

And it is not the CEOs of Blu or NJOY who shouldn't be able to sleep at night, it is Senator Rockefeller. How can he sleep each night, knowing that his actions are responsible for thousands of kids who, in the past four years, have become addicted to menthol cigarettes because he failed to act responsibly and are eventually going to die prematurely because of his sellout to Philip Morris?

D. Announced a ten-year, $500 million per year anti-smoking advertising campaign that focuses on directly countering cigarette advertising.

LAST：2014 china Starway ego c twist aero tank e cigarette |NEXT：2014 huge vapor clearomizer et-s bdc clearomizer from aspire bdc