Why is the CDC unable to tell the truth? Why can't the agency even issue a statement that is internally consistent on this issue? Why is the CDC ignoring the wealth of evidence that it admits exists, which shows that many ex-smokers have used electronic cigarettes effectively as a smoking cessation aid?

As I revealed earlier this week, Stan Glantz has publicly which imply that electronic cigarette companies have been behind the scenes and paying for statements by a number of right-wing think tanks that are supportive of electronic cigarettes.

A new published today in the journal Tobacco Control demonstrates why the FDA's proposed regulatory approach for electronic cigarettes makes no sense. In fact, the new research shows why the FDA's approach would be a complete bureaucratic nightmare, while not actually protecting the public's health.

Back in 2010 the documented smoking rate was 14%; a superb rate and lower than the Nation. However, according to the latest data, as of last year there were approximately a little over 16% adults smoked last year, a rise from the recorded value of 2010. So even with the increase restrictions and high taxes, New Yorkers are still finding tobacco to be a sought after commodity. Either that or more adults are switching back to smoking ever since the electronic cigarette ban. Considering smoking is more convenient in terms of not having to charge, take care of E-Juice, and replacing coils, I can see how there is almost easier just to pick up a pack of cigarettes when there is almost no incentive to use electronic cigarettes.

LAST：hot sell e cig smoking vaporizer ego t ce5 electronic cigarette |NEXT：2014 Kienast Dry Herb Vaporizer Hight Quality Products Igo W3 Atomizer Clone