Thus, not only is hiding conflicts of interest an ethical violation, but it is potentially damaging as well. Once researchers in a field are viewed by the public as hiding relationships, the reputation of the entire field may be tarnished. Just look at what happened to the field of global climate change after it was revealed that merely one of hundreds of researchers in the field may have been biased in his approach.

Had there been no reliable evidence that Chantix may cause serious neuropsychiatric events like suicide or other violent behavior, then why did the FDA conclude - after reviewing the evidence - that a black box warning is required?

Now, if those 100 resistant smokers were then followed for six months, we would expect that very few of them would quit smoking because all of them had already tried e-cigarettes and failed.

Why is the CDC unable to tell the truth? Why can't the agency even issue a statement that is internally consistent on this issue? Why is the CDC ignoring the wealth of evidence that it admits exists, which shows that many ex-smokers have used electronic cigarettes effectively as a smoking cessation aid?

The UK's Committee of Advertising Practice (CAP) has announced , effective on November 10, which restrict electronic cigarette advertising.

LAST：2014 Aspire mini nautilus Newest technology BVC coil Aspire Nautilus Mini |NEXT：Economy health colorful ego k electronic cigarette e-cig ce4 ce5 ce6