Remember that I did not argue that a smoker switching from a non-filtered to a filtered cigarette brand will reduce her cancer risk. It may be that vigorous compensation offsets the impact of such a change. However, I do believe that the scientific evidence supports the contention that all else being equal, a lifelong smoker of non-filtered cigarettes faces a slightly higher cancer risk than a lifelong smoker of filtered cigarettes.

The truth is that this paper provides no evidence whatsoever that e-cigarette use is a gateway to smoking. Instead, it is entirely possible - and quite likely - that youths who use e-cigarettes are more likely to be heavier and more resistant smokers.

All three of these entities have offered common sense advice with which I wholeheartedly agree. In fact, this advice may be the single most important change that I recommend in the proposed deeming regulations.

LAST：New product ecigator ecig glass GDC atomizer |NEXT：no wicking and rebuildable c4 /CE5/CE6/CE7/CE8/CE9 ce7 electronic cigarette