The Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids argued that the tobacco companies and retailers not be allowed to tell consumers that the renamed products are the same as the former products. But this would have been an unconstitutional restriction of free speech. Unless the renamed product is banned, or the descriptor used is in violation of the law because it directly infers that the cigarette is safer, then I'm afraid that the companies are in compliance with the law and the anti-smoking groups are going to have to respect that.

The first of these two debates is over whether or not to legalize the sales of electronic cigarettes in county jails, where the goal of this law requested by North Carolinas’ Sheriffs’ Association, would be to nullify a law passed earlier this year banning county inmates from possessing any and all electronic cigarettes and/or vapor related products. This new measure which has been quietly snuck into house bill 1133 specifically gives only county jails and “not” state prisons the authority to sell e-cigarettes and other smoking “cessation” items like nicotine patches or lozenges, which has the potential of raising millions in desperately needed revenue for the ever increasing costs of running, improving and maintaining county jail operations.

The relative safety of e-cigarettes over tobacco cigarettes is their primary selling point.

LAST：Dry herb/wax vaporizer pen exgo w3 hot new products for 2014 Tower tank |NEXT：China manufacturer good price wholesale ce4 starter kits