The study authors attack the cigarette companies for substituting another term in the brand name for their products after removing the offending terms ("lights," "ultra-lights," "mild," etc.). But what they fail to acknowledge is that in order to comply with the law, the cigarette companies had no other choice. Had they simply removed the offending descriptor, this would have resulted in their having four or five brands with the exact same name, preventing consumers from having any way to distinguish these brands. Such a result would have effectively removed these brands from the market, which was clearly not the intent of Congress. Had Congress intended to remove these brands from the market, it would have simply banned these brands altogether.

6. Very few nonsmokers or long-term ex-smokers are using electronic cigarettes.

The Rest of the Story

The name of the Nicoventures representative was suppressed by the TGA, which also edited large parts of the company’s pitch.

LAST：2014 top selling Smoktech Oceanic Starter kit 2.0ml Aro Tank 650/900/1100mah Ego vv battery kit |NEXT：2014 hot selling IJOY newest electronic cigarette mt3 clearomizer