In epidemiology, we have a term to describe what Glantz and Dutra are doing here. There is a term that we commonly use to describe a statement that is crafted to deliberately mislead the public about study results. That term is: a lie.

In light of these findings, the best that the study authors could do to implicate electronic cigarettes as a human health hazard was to proclaim that "e-cigarettes are not emission-free." If that is the worst thing that thsee researchers can say, then it certainly doesn't appear to rise to the level of a known health hazard for which government intervention is necessary at this time.

LAST：S-BODY 2014 DNA 30 Mod EZDNA VV VW Mod from Electronic Cigarette Manufacturer China |NEXT：alibaba express hot selling dual coil spring pin e cigarette ce5 clearomizer with high quality