The restriction is inappropriate because it prohibits companies from simply telling consumers the truth about the relative safety of their products. Arguably, this is the single most important piece of information that every consumer needs to know. Keeping consumers in the dark about the relative safety of electronic cigarettes vs. tobacco cigarettes does not serve any public health interest. In fact, it does just the opposite.

To me personally it is really an art form and making it by hand meets my needs more than a machine. However, the aspect of human error doesn’t escape me either as an E-Juice maker can easily confuse VG and PG if they are not paying attention and botch up my E-Juice (it’s happened before, most likely will happen again); either way I am happy to see both vendors taking safety and contamination into heavy consideration prior to making and selling their E-Juices. I’ve seen many stores that make their E-Juice out in the open, next to food or drinks, and keeps mixing materials in the bathroom (yuck). Avoid those stores at all costs as the last thing you want in your E-Juice is someone’s lunch!!

But the question is: why even take this chance? Why is there a need to rely upon defamatory and false statements to promote the public's health? Why isn't telling the truth good enough for ANR?

LAST：Cheapest!!! 2013 most popular hot selling e cigarette adjust voltage mini ego twist battery ego evod starter kit ego t blister |NEXT：dry herbal atomizer cloutank M4 with airflow control system from cloupor wholesale 2014